|
|
Newsletter
Invitation:
Postings
to the Archive are listed only on
the Newsletter invitation
page:
These
newsletters are sent only to people
on the Eagle-Research newsletter
list, which is strictly an opt-in
list.
If
you received this email in error you
can unsubscribe using the
instructions at the bottom of this
column. If you wish to communicate
with Eagle-Research, send your email
to:
<
>
If
a friend sent you a copy of this
newsletter and you wish to
subscribe, see instructions at the
bottom of this column.
If
you know someone who you believe
would like to be subscribed to this
unique newsletter; invite them to
view:
www.eagle-research.com
/newsletter/newsletter.html
The
Eagle-Research newsletters are
archived, but the archive listing
will always lag by one issue, to
give subscribers first
view.
Note
that we do NOT give out your
personal information without your
permission. We may allow advertisers
to put ads in this newsletter, but
only those that support the spirit
of the newsletter.
|
.
|
Available
in HTML @:
www.eagle-research.com/newsletter/archive/2004/2004_10.html
EAGLE-RESEARCH
NEWSLETTER: October,
2004
WHAT'S
NEW
Issue
Feature: Suppression
Fuel
Saver news
Free
Energy Comments
Brown's
Gas news
Reader
Comments
Coming
Up
Never
doubt that a small group of
thoughtful citizens can change the
world. Indeed, it is the only thing
that ever has.
-
Margaret Mead -
****************************************************
WHAT'S
NEW (top)
•
The next Energy Club is started.
We are building and installing HyZor
Technology in our Penticton, BC
lab/shop.
•
Circuits for Success
Survey:
Last
issue we asked for readers to vote
on the order of preference on 'ready
made' circuits needed by our vehicle
enhancement technology. We received
a very large response (thank you)
and are now planning on getting
those circuits done.
=====================================================
|
|
|
|
Issue
Feature:
SUPPRESSION (top)
In
light of the upcoming USA election,
I have a few comments. I'm really
trying NOT to be 'political' in this
newsletter. The problem is that the
issues at stake (and being
suppressed) are now worldwide issues
and only USA citizens have a chance
to vote for who is (publicly) going
to be deciding policy on the issues
in the United States of
America.
•
I recommend anyone thinking of
voting to watch the documentary by
Michael Moore called 'Fahrenheit
911'. It is available in most video
stores.
This
documentary features facts about our
current president that have been
suppressed by mainstream media; the
same media that has featured a
documentary about the president's
closest competition. (Note: names
are eliminated to, hopefully, allow
this newsletter to bypass Internet
suppression).
I
then encourage you to vote and
encourage anyone you know to vote.
This will be a close election. You
do make a difference; as was proven
last election in Florida, Every Vote
Counts.
•
For those people who are looking
for the man would best handle the
current 'war' economy; I have this
to say:
•
I have seen no evidence that the
'War on Terrorism' needed to include
invading Irac.
•
According to reports I've seen
(many are suppressed), that decision
is going to kill at least as many
Americans as died in the Trade
Towers.
•
Forcing the invasion of Irac has
caused most of the world to look
upon America as a 'superpower
terrorist state'; making travel
anywhere for American citizens
uncomfortable to dangerous and
enhancing actual terrorist
activities.
•
It is my firm belief that the
war is about oil and control, not
terrorism.
•
And finally, any man who uses
fear as a means to stay in control
is not a man I want in control of my
country.
While
not ignoring war and terrorists,
this newsletter is featuring
suppression. There are many kinds of
suppression, some of which I've
mentioned in previous
newsletters:
www.eagle-research.com/newsletter/archive/1999/1999_07.html
www.eagle-research.com/newsletter/archive/1999/1999_08.html
www.eagle-research.com/newsletter/archive/2000/2000_02.html
www.eagle-research.com/newsletter/archive/2000/2000_04.html
www.eagle-research.com/newsletter/archive/2000/2000_12.html
In
this newsletter I'll be discussing
(like in the 'election' text above)
the need to take personal
responsibility for your
participation in 'suppression'. I
know for the most part I'm
'preaching to the converted' but I'm
hoping that you will deepen your
commitment and help spread this
message to your circle of influence.
Most
people allow 'Big Brother' to take
care of their needs. This allows
'Vested Interest' to make HUGE
amounts of money from what they
consider to be an 'income pool'
consisting of people.
To
keep their income as high as
possible they dictate-teach-control
the people through various means,
including the possibility of
'cutting them off' if they don't
comply. Most people buy into this
because they don't want the bother
of taking personal responsibility
for their lives; an attitude
fostered by the 'Vested
Interest'.
We
need to acknowledge and address the
issues that the PLANET is having.
While some people think of 'The Day
After Tomorrow' as just a movie, I
see a serious truth in it.
The
scenario presented is scientifically
possible and, this is the scary
part, probable. In my opinion it was
well thought out and presented. It
referenced several pieces of
evidence that this event (greenhouse
gas induced ice age) has happened in
the past and may happen in the near
future. Unlike getting hit with an
asteroid, this is an event which we
(I hope) can prevent.
Substantial
renewable energy technology does
exist now. It is just underfunded
and competing against artificially
inexpensive
fossil-fuels.
I
shake my head when I think that the
renewable energy policies of Jimmy
Carter would likely have reduced the
dependence on oil enough that this
war on Irac would not have been
required.
Jimmy
Carter had the right idea, finance
energy alternatives directly, with
tax incentives and with large
government sponsored rebates. The
money to do so coming from higher
taxes on fossil-fuel and redirecting
funds supporting environmentally
destructive energy
policies.
For
those people who think I'm crazy
because they don't want to pay more
money for energy; I say:
•
In North America, where we use
substantially more energy per capita
than any other continent, we are
paying some of the lowest fuel
taxes. See:
www.eagle-research.com/newsletter/archive/2000/2000_08.html
www.eagle-research.com/newsletter/archive/2000/2000_10.html
•
Our current energy is coming from
sources that are changing the world
climate to something we will be very
uncomfortable with. Millions of
people all over the world are
already being affected (even killed)
by the climatic deviations. It is
going to get a lot
worse.
•
I'm PERSONALLY working on
several practical means to reduce
consumption of fossil-fuel while
maintaining a high standard of
living. Our progress is slower than
I'd like because we are underfunded
and understaffed. Still, our
spinoffs have already made a
difference to nearly 100,000 people.
This link will help explain how you
can take advantage of combustion
enhancement technology available
NOW:
http://www.eagle-research.com/FAQ/FS/fsfaq.html
Note
that there is a PDF flowchart to
assist you.
http://www.eagle-research.com/products/pfuels.html
c)
The price of fuel is going to
continue to rise anyway, so why not
apply fuel saving techniques and/or
switch to more environmentally
compatible sources NOW, when it may
still help.
d)
Changes in energy policy/use in
North America would make a large
difference in the world. We need
take personal responsibility to set
the example. Our politicians listen
to the masses and the masses want
wastefully huge volumes of low cost
energy. The grassroots energy
alternative movement needs support
by people willing to be
'inconvenienced' and pay more for
environmentally compatible
solutions.
Is
it fair to ask everyone else to use
less energy and not reduce
ourselves? What kind of example are
we giving to the people who want a
standard of living like ours? What
technology will they be
'copying'?
This
newsletter is about suppression.
Today I'm talking about a different
kind of 'vested interest'
suppression. People who choose (are
vested in) Big Brother's energy pool
are supporting 'Vested Interest'
suppression. This support is causing
wars over energy and is dramatically
changing our environment. Our energy
choices are causing people to die by
being shot, by 'natural' disasters
and by starvation.
We
mention some environmental
facts:
www.eagle-research.com/newsletter/archive/2003/2003_04.html
http://www.greencarcongress.com/2004/10/sudden_unexplai.html
http://www.lifeaftertheoilcrash.net/
Here
are comments from 'the other
side'
http://www.predictweather.com/global_warming/index.asp
Here
is an eMagazine to which I have not
yet subscribed:
https://www.kable.com/pub/enmg/subTrial.asp?src=QSA136
Each
of us are personally responsible for
the decisions we make everyday.
These decisions affect the planets
politics and environment. You can
VOTE for the planet, bypassing (even
changing) the politics by the
decisions you make:
1)
Take responsibility for your own
comfort and safety.
Don't
depend on 'Big Brother' to take care
of you. Your life and comfort depend
on being able to look after
yourself. Big Brother's help is
always too little, too late.
Giving
control to Big Brother always
results in suppression of individual
rights and freedoms. The strongest
nation is always made up of
independently strong individuals
operating interdependently. We've
written a book called
'Do-it-Yourself Crisis Survival'
that will help you prepare your
family and home for nearly any kind
of crisis:
http://www.eagle-research.com/store/
2)
Look around your life for ways to
reduce energy
consumption.
Most
energy reduction 'pays for itself'
in direct energy savings. An
excellent source of 'Do-it-Yourself'
information can be found
at:
http://www.realgoods.com
3)
Look for ways to manufacture your
own energy.
Most
locations have access to energy that
they are not utilizing. Energy
flowing past them everyday which
could be tapped with conventional
technology. With reduced energy
consumption and 'load controllers',
it is possible for many homes to be
energy self-sufficient. You can
research conventional energy
gathering alternatives
at:
http://www.homepower.com
Here
at Eagle-Research, we are
researching further energy
alternatives that are not yet
'on-the-shelf'. Looking for
practical ways that individual homes
can take advantage of ambient
(environmentally compatible) energy
sources that have not yet been
developed. We are having some
success but not a practical system
yet. In the research process we are
discovering lots of ways (spinoffs)
to make 'conventional' energy
systems more efficient.
For
example: with conventional
technology available today, some
homes could be net energy producers.
We sell a book called 'Reverse Your
Electric Meter, Legally' that
explains a simple technique to store
your excess power in the utility
grid as a 'credit' on your power
meter.
This
simple and inexpensive technique
vastly reduces the cost of
independent home power systems by
eliminating or postponing the need
for energy storage (like a large
battery bank) and/or a large
inverter. It also allows huge
'seasonal' energy gathering to be
stored, like massive sunshine in the
arctic summer to be used in the
winter; or huge water flow from
spring runoff to provide power the
rest of the year.
Here
are excerpts from an interesting
email from the supercarbs
egroup:
Hi
John,
Interesting
quote from that article "CO2
occupies 0.035% of the atmosphere.
If it doubled it would only be
0.07%. We can all live with that.
99.9% of all the world's CO2 is at
ground level or below, 71% being
dissolved in the
oceans."
Key
phrase "71% being dissolved in the
oceans". This is the REAL problem,
as CO2 doesn't just dissolve, it
chemically reacts, making carbonic
acid, which kills off marine life.
The oceans will reach a point where
they can't absorb any more, when
that happens... See ya!
So,
all the anti-CO2 emission people are
doing the right thing, but for the
wrong reasons. Better than doing the
wrong thing for the right reasons
for sure, but personally, I like to
know what's really going on (as best
I can).
Frankly,
I believe we are not likely to run
out of oil in our (or the next
generations) lifetime. Also, global
warming looks like it's most likely
caused by high energy particles from
the sun, not CO2 emissions. Gonna
take a while for the facts to win
out on that one.
The
real environmental problem (which is
just beginning to be discussed) is
that all that CO2 is being absorbed
by the oceans, which are becoming
more acidic every day (shellfish,
coral etc. are starting to
dissolve). If they get too acidic,
then the algae is likely to die, in
which case we lose 75% of the oxygen
production on this planet. When that
happens, it really is "game
over".
Dave
=====================================================
|
|
Note:
I drive older vehicles because I
believe in getting everything out of a
vehicle that it is capable of
giving.
There
is a significant environmental cost to
manufacturing a vehicle.
Having
the vehicle on the road for twice as
long saves tons of pollution by only
needing to produce half the new
vehicles.
Jobs
and resources that are now used to
build new vehicles could be used to
maintain the ones already on the
road.
Of
course, vehicles could be designed that
would not break down for hundreds of
thousands of miles, which would free
people and resources for other
purposes.
|
|
FUEL
SAVER NEWS:
(top)
What
can happen when a technology is
simply too
good!?
Andrew
Michrowski
Date:
Mon, 23 Aug 2004 11:43:33
-0700
Subject:
Ford Crushes 'Clean Cars' While
Greenwashing Gas
Guzzlers
From:
Rainforest Action Network
<media@ran.org>
Paul
West, Rainforest Action Network,
(415) 398-4404 x319,
media@ran.org
Toben
Dilworth, (415) 596-6051 (on-site
mobile)
Ford
Crushes 'Clean Cars' While
Greenwashing Gas
Guzzlers
*
Activists stage flag-draped funeral
at San Francisco Ford dealer as
EV
drivers
are forced to turn over their cars
to be crushed.
*
Global grassroots coalition demands
that Ford 'TH!NK twice'
before
destroying
the most fuel efficient car in its
oil addicted fleet.
*
Ford ignores Norwegian offer to
purchase TH!NK EVs.
San
Francisco &endash; Today in San
Francisco and tomorrow in Oslo,
Global
Exchange,
Greenpeace, Rainforest Action
Network and an
international
grassroots
coalition will protest Ford Motor
Company's plans to destroy
of
all
of its TH!NK zero emission electric
vehicles (EV) in the United
States,
the
most fuel efficient cars in its oil
addicted fleet. The
transatlantic
actions
are the latest from Jumpstart Ford,
the global grassroots
movement
to
end Ford's five year oil binge and
compel America's
worst-ranked
automaker
to produce a fleet of
environmentally ethical, zero
emissions
vehicles.
Who:
EV drivers, environmental and human
rights activists,
veterans,
representatives
from local government and impacted
communities
What:
Flag-draped funeral for Ford TH!NK
EVs as drivers reluctantly
turn
over
their cars to be crushed
When:
TODAY at 12:00 noon (Monday, August
23, 2004)
Where:
S&C Ford, 2001 Market Street @
Dolores, San Francisco
In
a somber noontime ceremony at
S&C Ford in San Francisco,
mourners in
black
veils will pay last respects to
flag-draped Ford TH!NK EVs
honoring
the
clean car technology for its
34-month long service in the
global
movement
to save Earth's climate from deadly
greenhouse gas
emissions.
Veterans
for Peace will facilitate a Military
Funeral Honors ceremony
to
include
the playing of "Taps" and the
folding and presenting of a
burial
flags
to grieving TH!NK EV owners.
Inspiring eulogies will be delivered
by
George
Johnson of Veterans for Peace,
Jennifer Krill of Rainforest
Action
Network,
Jason Mark of Global Exchange,
Randall Hayes of the
Oakland
Department
of the Environment, Leila Salazar of
Amazon Watch, Dr. Henry
Clark
of the West County Toxics Coalition
and Kristin Casper of
Greenpeace.
The
Ford TH!NK funeral is in response to
the American automaker's refusal to
accept repeated offers from Elbil
Norge, a Norwegian EV car
manufacturer, to purchase the zero
emission vehicles to meet growing
consumer demand in Norway, a nation
powered almost entirely by renewable
electricity. Ford's August 2002
decision to shut down its EV program
and destroy the U.S. TH!NK fleet
followed the auto industry's gutting
of California's zero emission
mandate in June 2002.
"Ford
is pulling the plug on the only cars
in its gas guzzling fleet
that
don't
produce deadly greenhouse gas
emissions," said Jennifer
Krill,
director
of the Zero Emissions Campaign at
Rainforest Action Network.
"By
crushing
these beloved cars and ending its EV
program, Ford is
shattering
the
new American dream for an energy
independent future. EVs are the
perfect solution for progressive
places like Norway and Northern
California where reliable sources of
renewable energy are on the rise. In
light of mounting evidence that
tailpipe emissions are a leading
contributor to catastrophic climate
change, Ford's addiction to oil is
an environmental crime. Ford should
manufacture and market
environmentally ethical EVs as
aggressively as it has pushed its
oil addicted SUVs. Ford's decision
to crush perfectly reliable zero
emission vehicles proves once again
that it is more interested in
greenwashing gas-guzzlers than
innovating an emission free future.
The TH!NK EV is a casualty of Ford's
oil addiction."
"The
TH!NK EVs were produced in Norway,
and Norwegians want them back," said
Truls Gulowsen of Greenpeace in
Norway. "It is wrong for Ford to
crush these cars. A Norwegian
company has even offered Ford a
million dollars to purchase the
TH!NKs but has so far received
nothing but arrogant silence. This
shows that Ford has other motives
than environmental protection and
sound business
principles."
"Ford
needs to think straight and realize
that pure electric vehicles
can
play
an important role in breaking the
company's oil addiction," said
Jason
Mark,
clean car campaigner at the human
rights group Global Exchange.
"It
seems
that Ford isn't thinking at all. Why
would the company
wantonly
destroy
these vehicles when drivers here in
the US and in Europe are begging to
keep them?"
"I
leased a Ford TH!NK in November,
2001 at S&C Ford in San
Francisco," said TH!NK driver Marc
Geller. "In repeated discussions
between June and November 2001
leading up to my decision to lease
the 2001 TH!NK, Frank Ginotti, S
& C Ford Fleet Sales, told me
the 2003 model would be available
for purchase. I followed Ford's
progress, including photos of the
new model on the assembly line in
Norway, its introduction at the 2002
Los Angeles and New York Auto Shows
and its appearance in the 2003 Ford
Fleet Guide. Ford broke its promise
to me and hundreds of others who
leased the TH!NK."
"If
automakers don't reduce smog-forming
emissions, greenhouse gases and the
need for petroleum, I believe we
won't be in business," said Fujio
Cho,
president
of Toyota in The New York
Times.
Ford
Motor Company is America's oil
addict. According the U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency, the
average fuel efficiency of Ford cars
and trucks today is 18.8 mpg, dead
last among the top six automakers
for the fifth consecutive year. From
subcompacts to SUVs, Ford's current
fleet of cars and trucks gets fewer
miles per gallon on average than its
Model-T did 80 years ago. Ford's
widely touted 'eco-friendly' Rouge
River plant features a
water-preserving green roof, yet
manufactures 280,000 gas-guzzling
F-150s a year, generating up to 100
tons of atmospheric carbon a piece
over each truck's lifetime. Marketed
as "the first American hybrid,"
Ford's so-called 'no compromise'
Escape represents less than one half
of one percent of its fleet and will
have virtually no impact on its last
place fuel efficiency
ranking.
In 2000, Ford promised to improve
the fuel efficiency of its
fleet
of
SUVs 25 percent by 2005. In 2003,
the company announced its intention
to break that promise. Despite
waiting lists for zero emissions
cars, Ford has ended all programs,
and blamed consumers for its lack of
innovation.
The
TH!NK EVs are the first mass
produced car in Norwegian history
and have become a national symbol of
pride and progress for the role they
play in reducing air pollution and
ending oil addiction.
Global
Exchange (www.globalexchange.org),
Greenpeace (www.greenpeace.no) and
Rainforest Action Network
(www.ran.org) are members of an
international grassroots movement
calling on Ford to commit to achieve
a fleet-wide average of 50 MPG by
2010 and eliminate tailpipe
emissions by 2020. For more
information, please visit
www.JumpStartFord.com.
Next
Stage Of Fuel Saver Technology On
The Honda
No
real news since the last newsletter.
We are establishing the new mileage
baseline. Our baseline includes the
fuel pressure regulator and the
deceleration fuel shutoff.
We
are now assembling the Carburetor
Enhancer, with electronic upgrade,
and the HyZor system to install in a
couple of months.
See
pictures and schematics of the
upgrade to date.
www.eagle-research.com/fuelsav/83honda/83honda.html
Before
engine rebuild:
Total
time invested to date: 10
hours
Total
money invested to date: actual cost
$270 (least cost = $150)
Technology
installed: fuel filter, fuel
pressure regulator, vacuum gauge,
automatic fuel shutoff circuit with
manual bypass.
EPA
highway mileage (US gallon) 34 mpg,
current mileage 40 mpg.
=====================================================
|
|
Eagle-Research
defines 'free energy' as usable
energy that comes directly from the
environment (you did not pay anyone
for it).
Eagle-Research
tends to ignore 'traditional'
sources of free energy such as wind,
solar, water power and geothermal
because such technologies do not
need our innovation. With the
exception of technology that
increases the efficiency of
traditional sources or makes
traditional sources 'more practical'
for people.
We
concentrate on energy sources that
are not yet developed, such as
gravity, ambient heat, ambient
electrical potentials, orgone
energy, etc.
-------
Eagle-Research
defines an 'over-unity' system as a
system that produces more measured
output energy than measured input
energy.
This
does not mean we get 'something for
nothing', it simply means that we
did not measure all the input
energy.
In
some technologies (such as orgone
energy), we do not yet know how to
measure the input energies.
|
|
FREE
ENERGY COMMENTS
(top)
Dear
Readers,
As
you may know, I do think that Joseph
Newman's technology is valid in that
it produces more energy than it
'consumes' and can be 'self-running'
while still producing excess power.
However, I do not consider it to be
practical because his machines are
HUGE and HEAVY compared to the power
output.
I
base this opinion on personal
experience with his technology and
with my own research.
I
thought you'd like to see a recent
series of news releases from his
group:
FOR
IMMEDIATE
RELEASE
10/7/04
Energizer
Battery Corp. sent me an email
stating:
"WE
DO NOT RECOMMEND THAT YOU USE OUR
6-VOLT ENERGIZER BATTERIES IN SERIES
(600 VOLTS) TO RUN A 7,500-LB MOTOR
ATTACHED TO A 10kW
GENERATOR."
Fact:
Two
of those batteries in series
connected to one (1) car light will
be
DEAD IN 3 MINUTES!
(The
battery voltage drops from 12.7
volts to less than 8
volts)
Fact:
A
500-volt battery pack of Energizer
6-volt lantern batteries
(connected
in series)
have
- as of this day - been running my
7,500-lb Energy Machine
and
- despite chain and gear losses -
been
continuously
running a 10kW generator for SEVEN
HOURS!
Fact:
These
batteries should have been DEAD IN
LESS THAN ONE (1)
MINUTE!
[The
amp capacity of batteries in series
is equal to the amp capacity
of
one (1) battery.]
Fact:
A
Fluke #79 hand-held meter placed
across one 6-volt battery of the
pack reads "OL - 5" volts
REPEATEDLY.
"OL"
= OVERLOAD
Fact:
"OL"
on the Fluke meter means MORE THAN
ONE THOUSANDS VOLTS!
Fact:
THE
BATTERIES ARE BEING RECHARGED WHILE
THE ENERGY MACHINE
OPERATES!
Fact:
The
Energy Machine & 10kW generator
will be operated each day for 2
hours and the results will be posted
at this website.
__________________________________________________
FOR
IMMEDIATE
RELEASE
10/8/04
The
7500-lb Energy Machine, 1200-lb
rotor, with associated
gear/pulley
losses powering a 10kW
generator
has
now been continuously running for
TEN HOURS!
As
previously stated:
The
manufacturer of the 6-volt dry cell
lantern batteries used in
conjunction
with this system stated beforehand
that under such conditions the
batteries WOULD NOT
WORK.
Not
only that the RPM of the 7500-lb
Energy Machine from start time
after
7 hours of running -- then INCREASED
IN SPEED & TORQUE by 31% in 2
hours of additional
running.
Fact:
It
takes 60 lbs to rotate the 7500-lb
Energy Machine's 1200 rotary
shaft
by hand at even 1 rpm.
Fact:
At
higher rpms, it takes HUNDREDS OF
LBS to rotate that
rotary.
Fact:
According
to the manufacturer, these batteries
used in this system
should
have been DEAD LONG AGO --- prior to
the first hour of
running,
MORE
THAN NINE (9) HOURS AGO!
Fact:
The
reason the batteries are not dead is
because of the
BACK-CHARGE
of
my 7500-lb Energy Machine which
utilizes 6-volt dry cell batteries
that
ARE
NOT SUPPOSED TO BE
RECHARGEABLE.
__________________________________________________
FOR
IMMEDIATE
RELEASE
10/9/04
The
7500-lb Energy Machine, 1650-lb
rotor (including attached 450-lb
flywheel)
and with associated gear/pulley
losses powering a 10kW generator has
now been continuously running for
TWELVE HOURS!
As
previously stated:
The
manufacturer of the 6-volt dry cell
lantern batteries used in
conjunction
with this system stated beforehand
that under such conditions the
batteries WOULD NOT
WORK.
To
appreciate the torque or load on the
7500-lb Energy Machine
Motor:
There
is a 6 to 1 gear & chain ratio
from my Motor to the PTO generator
and
then
a 6 to 1 gear ratio of the PTO gear
box to the generator. That
equals
a ratio of: THIRTY-SIX TO ONE TURN
OF THE MOTOR!
I
know from years of experience that
one could conservatively predict
that the Motor could have been
pumping water at 100 gallons per
minute or
6,000
gallons of water per hour. Or, in
twelve hours, that would
represent:
SEVENTY-TWO
THOUSAND GALLONS OF WATER FOR DYING
CHILDREN IN AFRICA & ELSEWHERE
WHO LACK SUFFICIENT ACCESS TO FRESH
WATER.
PEOPLE
OF THE WORLD: Where is your
conscience?
This
Motor is RUNNING OFF ITS OWN
POWER!
The
volt meter placed across a one,
6-volt dry cell battery shows the
voltage
changing
continuously from 4.5 volts to 20
volts to MINUS voltage and
over
ONE
THOUSAND VOLTS!
If
you love Humanity, call the
President of my production
company:
Mr.
Joseph Nolfe at
205-835-9022
to
participate in the expansion and
development of this
technology.
__________________________________________________
We
have now produced a video of the
above demonstration (c. 1.5 hours
long
in VHS, CD, or DVD format) which
proves that this technology is now
ready to power the world's energy
needs. The video may be ordered for
only $20 (including
shipping/handling) from:
JOSEPH
NEWMAN PUBLISHING
COMPANY
Order/Processing
Dept., Attn: Mr. Darryl
Bonz
3725
South Division Street
Grand
Rapids, Michigan 49548
__________________________________________________
"The
future of the human race may be
dramatically uplifted by the
large-scale,
commercial development of this
invention."
---
Dr. Roger Hastings, Principal
Physicist, UNISYS
CORPORATION
"If
the manner in which Joseph Newman
conducted his experiments and
the
results were made known to the
industrial or engineering community
then, in my opinion, several
companies and/or
individuals
possess
the expertise and capabilities to
construct the hardware
required
to fully exploit the apparent
capability of his new
concepts."
---
Dr. Robert E. Smith, Chief, Orbital
and Space Environment Branch,
George
C. Marshall Space Flight Center,
NASA
"You
have opened an area in Astrophysics
which may revolutionize the
magnetic
energy problems which is now the
most paramount problem in future
energy and space travel.
I
do believe with proper research
funds, the results would not only
be
a great financial boom to your
financiers, but would lead to
developments that will be practical
and beneficial to all mankind and
develop a new step in
science."
---
Dr. E. L. Moragne, MORAGNE RESEARCH
& DEVELOPMENT CO.
[Dr.
Moragne was an electromagnetic
pioneer in the development of the
first
atomic bomb.]
http://www.josephnewman.com
=====================================================
|
|
Brown's
Gas is defined as:
"The
entire mixture of gasses coming out
of an electrolyzer designed to
electrolyze (split) water and
specifically does not separate the
resulting gasses from each
other."
Brown's
Gas is a ratio of about 2 parts
hydrogen to 1 part oxygen and
usually contains a significant water
vapor component.
|
|
BROWN'S
GAS NEWS (top)
We
are hosting the next Major Brown's
Gas Event in Penticton, BC on May
13-14, 2005. For Meeting Details Go
to:
http://www.watertorch.com/news/news1.html
Fill
out the registration form and mail
or FAX it to us.
contact
us if you have any further
questions.
Learn
about applications
that can make money for you. Brown's
Gas is an industry changing
technology that's time has truly
come, mostly due to the innovations
implemented by Eagle-Research. There
are dozens of profitable
applications that represent
literally Billions of income
potential.
Learn
how you can join the team that is
already out in the marketplace,
making money and having fun, go to:
www.watertorch.com
ER1200
WaterTorch™ PRICE CHANGE
NOTICE!
Materials
costs continue to rise dramatically
and we have little markup on the
ER1200 WaterTorches, so the price
WILL be increasing to $3700 in the
next run of
watertorches.
I'm
giving you, our newsletter readers,
the heads up on this price increase
so that, if you were considering
ordering, you can do so now. We have
a few left in this production
run.
BROWN'S
GAS MINI DEMOS
2004
George
Wiseman hosts several FREE
Brown's Gas Demonstrations to
highlight some of the unique
characteristics of this diverse gas.
These mini demos are an ideal time
for potential WaterTorch™
buyers to get up close and personal
experience with both the gas and the
simple rugged elegance of an ERxxxx
WaterTorch™.
Attendance
is free. Space is limited.
Pre-registration IS required.
Reserve by email, FAX or
phone.
All
Mini Demos are scheduled for 6 - 8
pm
These
are held in Penticton, BC at our
Shop-Lab.
•
Wednesday, November 10 /
04
•
Wednesday, December 8 /
04
=====================================================
|
|
Dear
readers,
We
appreciate the emails sent to us.
To
keep the newsletter shorter, we
select only a few representative
ones.
Your
comments help us in many ways. We
welcome each and every
one.
Thank
you :)))))
|
|
READER
COMMENTS (top)
Hi
my name is Ray Lorenzi, a long time
reader of "Eagle Research, and I
purchased some of the product's. My
question tonite is, "the application
of Brown's gas for my automobile"? I
don't understand how the container's
would be hooked up to the engine???
I'm not asking for a "FreeBee" of
information, I'm understandably
curious! Sincerily ----Ray Lorenzi.
(P.S. Youi folk's are great, God
Bless you and your good work. The
Planet need's you
product's.
Ray,
The
HyZor Technology Book details
exactly how to hook up your
'on-board' electrolyzer to your
engine. It is simply a hose to duct
the Brown's Gas from the
electrolyzer to either your intake
manifold or your air cleaner (your
choice).
--------------
>George,
>Thanks
for responding to my
email.
>
>It
appears that there is something
amiss with this whole thing
about
>gas-saving
devices - it's very confusing. ...It
makes a person
wonder.
>
>Regarding
the links: All I did was a search of
"gas-saving devices" and
I
>came
up with all sorts of stuff giving me
reasons to avoid trying any
of
>these
components.
>
>Just
by responding to my email, you've
given me more reason to try
testing
| |
